Showing posts with label Pirate Bay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pirate Bay. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Has the Pirate Bay given up piracy? – SciTechBlog - CNN.com Blogs

Has the Pirate Bay given up piracy? – SciTechBlog - CNN.com Blogs 

Has the Pirate Bay given up piracy?

 

The Pirate Bay, a Swedish file-sharing Web site used by millions to exchange movies and music, is reportedly being sold to the Swedish company Global Gaming Factory X AB for nearly $8 million.

 

A blog posted on thepiratebay.org Tuesday morning says rumors of the sale are true:

We’ve been working on this project for many years. It’s time to invite more people into the project, in a way that is secure and safe for everybody… The profits from the sale will go into a foundation that is going to help with projects about freedom of speech, freedom of information and the openess of the nets.

The Pirate Bay and its founders have been under legal attack from copyright owners for years. While the Web site does not host copyrighted content, it does host millions of torrent files which enable peer-to-peer file-trading. Many of these torrent files point to copyrighted material.

In April four of the Website’s co-founders were convicted of collaborating to violate copyright law and sentenced to one year in jail as well as ordered to pay $3.6 million in damages to several major media companies.

A press release from Global Gaming Factory suggests, following the sale, the Pirate Bay is done with piracy:

Following the completion of the acquisitions, GGF intends to launch new business models that allow compensation to the content providers and copyright owners. The responsibility for, and operation of the site will be taken over by GGF in connection with closing of the transaction, which is scheduled for August 2009.

There are hundreds of competing Websites that offer copyright infringing torrents, but it appears the Pirate Bay, which once claimed a spot on the Web’s top 100, will no longer be among them. The site claims more than 3.5 million registered users.

The news made Pirate Bay one of the top trending topics on Twitter Tuesday morning, with many tweets mourning the sale. “The Pirate Bay walks the plank for new biz model,” said one Twitterer.

Will the sale of the Pirate Bay mean an end to free copyrighted material for all? And can Global Gaming Factory monetize a site that is based on piracy?

Has the Pirate Bay given up piracy? – SciTechBlog - CNN.com Blogs

Friday, April 24, 2009

Pirate Bay judge accused of conflict of interest | Digital Media - CNET News

 Pirate Bay judge accused of conflict of interest | Digital Media - CNET News

Pirate Bay judge accused of conflict of interest

by Mats Lewan

The judge who ruled against The Pirate Bay defendants on Friday is a member of two copyright organizations, an alleged conflict of interest that could require the case to be tried again, Swedish press reported Thursday morning.

 

If the judge is formally found to have a conflict of interest, the case would have to be sent back to the district court. The issue is to be evaluated by the high court of justice, Svea Hovrätt (in Swedish), which is now also looking at appeals from the defendants on other grounds.

"In my appeal, I will urge that the verdict of the district court will be obviated due to conflict of interest," attorney Peter Althin, who is defending Pirate Bay spokesman Peter Sunde, told the Swedish daily newspaper Dagens Nyheter.

Sunde, along with Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Fredrik Neij, and Carl Lundström, were convicted Friday of having assisted in making 33 copyright-protected files accessible for illegal file sharing, and sentenced to one year in prison.

Norström is a member of the Swedish Copyright Association and the Swedish Association for Industrial Legal Protection. Both organizations say their goal is to educate about copyright issues. Among the members of the first organization are also Henrik Pontén, Peter Danowsky, and Monique Wadsted, all three of whom are lawyers who represented the plaintiffs during The Pirate Bay trial.

Norström denies accusations that the memberships would make him biased.

"Every time I take a case, I evaluate if I consider myself having a conflict of interest. In this case I didn't find to have one," Norström told Sveriges Radio, the national Swedish radio network that first exposed the issue on Thursday morning.

Norström also denies that he met privately with Wadsted, who represents several American media giants in the case. Both are also members of a separate professional group of a dozen law experts helping to resolve disputes on domain names under Sweden's top domain, .se.

Norström was asked to compare his situation to one with a potential jury member who declined to participate in the case because of a membership in a composers' association. In response, Norström told Dagens Nyheter that the Swedish Copyright Association only promotes knowledge about copyright, and that he is a member so he can follow related debate and development.

Wadsted also said that all jurists in Stockholm who deal with intellectual property are members of the The Swedish Copyright Association.

Still, Eric Bylander, a procedural law instructor at the University of Gothenburg finds the judge's situation questionable. "A membership here and a working community there would each maybe not be enough to constitute conflict of interest, but together they can," he told the Swedish national news agency, TT.

Mats Lewan, IT and telecom editor at Swedish technology weekly Ny Teknik, has joined CNET News as a 2009 fellow with Stanford University's Innovation Journalism program. E-mail Mats.

Pirate Bay judge accused of conflict of interest | Digital Media - CNET News

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Pirate Bay Case on Its Way to the Court of Appeal - PC World

Pirate Bay Case on Its Way to the Court of Appeal - PC World 

Pirate Bay Case on Its Way to the Court of Appeal

Mikael Ricknäs, IDG News Service

A lawyer for one of the defendants in the Pirate Bay case has already filed an appeal against the guilty verdict handed down by a Stockholm court on Friday, and lawyers for the other three defendants are gearing up to do the same.

The district court received an appeal on Friday on behalf of Carl Lundström, a spokeswoman at the court said.

Lundström was sentenced to a year in prison, like the other three defendants Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, and Peter Sunde. The court also ordered the four jointly to pay around 30 million Swedish kronor (US$3.6 million) in damages.

The appeal was filed quickly to make a statement about how wrong the sentence is, according to Stefan Jevinger, one of Lundström's two lawyers.

There are a number of things wrong with the sentence, according to the written appeal. For example, the appeal claims that in its grounds for the decision the district court wrote that it hadn't been shown that Lundström knew about the main crime -- yet he was still sentenced for being an accessory to crimes against copyright law. The appeal maintains that you can't be sentenced as accessory to a crime you don't know about.

The lawyers for the other three defendants have until May 8 to file their appeals. The prosecutor then has a week to respond, and then the case will be forwarded from the district court to the court of appeal.

Jonas Nilsson, who represents Neij, is aiming to file an appeal this week or next, and Ola Salomonsson, who represents Warg, said he will file an appeal before the deadline. Peter Althin, Sunde's lawyer, wasn't available to comment, but Sunde has made it clear he wants to appeal.

Nilsson expects the appeal will be heard in the first half of next year.

That timeline sounds reasonable, according to Salomonsson. "This is a bit more complicated than your ordinary bank robbery, and therefore it will take time," he said.

While all this takes place, The Pirate Bay site will continue to live on, according to Sunde.

Pirate Bay Case on Its Way to the Court of Appeal - PC World

Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood Daily

Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood Daily

"I know its a little old but I love her site -- it kept me sane durring the WGA strike and I follow-it for the SWG strike to come" HSM

EXCLUSIVE: Fox News Fires Showbiz Columnist For "Promoting" Piracy

Updates FBI Joins Fox In Hunt For Stolen 'Wolverine' Pirated On Web

 

SUNDAY UPDATE: News Corp issued the following statement from Los Angeles today confirming my reporting from Saturday -- "Roger Friedman’s views in no way reflect the views of News Corporation. We, along with 20th Century Fox Film Corporation, have been a consistent leader in the fight against piracy and have zero tolerance for any action that encourages and promotes piracy. When we advised Fox News of the facts they took immediate action, removed the post, and promptly terminated Mr. Friedman."

SATURDAY PM EXCLUSIVE: News Corp like all major Hollywood studios takes the crime of piracy very seriously. Nor will the Fox parent company tolerate it if its employees don't. Especially after a stolen, early and unfinished work print of 20th Century Fox's big summer blockbuster X-Men Origins: Wolverine was put onto the Internet illegally this week in a major scandal that the FBI is now investigating. So there was universal shock on Friday when long-time "Fox 411" freelance columnist Roger Friedman wrote what I'm told his bosses felt was a blatant promotion of piracy on his Fox News web outlet. Besides writing a review from watching the purloined print of Wolverine, Friedman posted, “I did find the whole top 10 [movies in theaters], plus TV shows, commercials, videos, everything, all streaming away. It took really less than seconds to start playing it all right onto my computer. I could have downloaded all of it but really, who has the time or the room? Later tonight I may finally catch up with Paul Rudd in I Love You, Man. It’s so much easier than going out in the rain!” I'm told that Fox News' actions were swift and severe. First, Roger Ailes, who oversees Fox News, deleted the offending post after he was contacted by 20th Century Fox about it. And then Ailes fired Friedman as a freelance Fox News entertainment writer. I hear the move was done with the full support of News Corp. "He promoted piracy. He basically suggested that viewing a stolen film is OK, which is absolutely intolerable. So we fired him," a source told me Saturday. "Fox News acted promptly on all fronts."

Friedman has written his gossip column, "Fox 411", for FoxNews.com for more than a decade and peppers it with celebrity items, industry news, and off-the-cuff movie reviews. He has long been a controversial writer who quite frequently angers the publicity machine surrounding actors, directors, producers, studios, celebrities, movies and TV. Occasionally he has scoops, especially about the music biz. Still, how could he not have known that his writings Friday would hit a nerve with his employers. After Friedman's column on FoxNews.com appeared, both News Corp and Fox condemned it as "promoting a pirated version of Wolverine".

News Corp issued this statement: “Roger Friedman’s views in no way reflect the views of News Corporation. We, along with 20th Century Fox Film Corporation, have been a consistent leader in the fight against piracy and have zero tolerance for any action that encourages and promotes piracy. Once we learned of Roger Friedman’s post we asked Fox News to remove it, which they did immediately.”

And Fox said, "We’ve just been made aware that Roger Friedman, a freelance columnist who writes Fox 411 on Foxnews.com – an entirely separate company from 20th Century Fox -- watched on the internet and reviewed a stolen and unfinished version of X-Men Orgins: Wolverine. This behavior is reprehensible and we condemn this act categorically -- whether the review is good or bad."

UPDATE: I did reach Friedman for comment. He emailed back only that he was at the Paul McCartney concert.

Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood Daily

Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » The Scourge of Scandinavia: The Dread Pirate Bay

 

The Scourge of Scandinavia: The Dread Pirate Bay

by Mark McKinnon

It wasn’t much of a surprise when the New York Times reported that one of the most highly anticipated movies of the year-X-Men Origins: Wolverine-had been leaked a month before the film’s release date and was available for download on illegal file-sharing sites.  Stories like that are all too common, unfortunately, with the ease of illegal file trafficking over P2P sites like Pirate Bay.  The Wolverine leak is particularly troubling because the leaked version was unfinished, missing several key scenes, music, and special effects. As the film’s star Hugh Jackman said, “It’s a serious crime and there’s no doubt it’s very disappointing. I was heartbroken by it. It’s like a Ferrari without a paint job.”

What was surprising however, is that this time, the leak was universally condemned by Wolverine’s online fan community, bloggers, movie buffs and comic book fans.  Several movie blogs are refusing to run reviews of the raw footage (FoxNews.com’s Roger Friedman was fired for writing a review of the pirated copy), while others such as Dark Horizon have condemned the uploading of the pirated copy as an “act that cruelly robs thousands of people of not just months of hard effort, but their livelihood as well.”  The New York Times was even spurred to ask whether Internet access is a fundamental human right, or a privilege, carrying with it a responsibility for good behavior.

Could the leak of Wolverine be the seminal moment when online piracy jumped the shark?  That’s doubtful, but the tide of public opinion does seem to be starting to turn.

Sweden has a particularly bad reputation when it comes to digital piracy.  It is the home of Pirate Bay-the self-proclaimed world’s largest bittorrent tracking site-but its bad reputation is well-deserved for other reasons too: the country’s main statistics agency recently estimated that 8% of the Swedish population uses P2P networks, and even major party political candidates there have supported decriminalizing “non-commercial” file-sharing. (Just how transfers of complete creative works can be considered “non-commercial” is befuddling: there is certainly a commercial impact on the creators, artists, and musicians who are not being compensated.  It’s a bit like saying that people who knowingly swap or receive stolen goods aren’t actually doing anything wrong, which is a bit of a head-scratcher.)

Even more stunning evidence of Sweden’s illegal file-sharing problem came last week when a new law aimed at curbing piracy took effect. The law, based on the EU’s Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), requires ISPs to divulge information about illegal file-sharing activity, allowing copyright holders to take legal action against infringers. The day after the law took effect, Internet traffic in Sweden plummeted by over thirty percent in the first 24 hours, and there’s little doubt as to why. 

But were the file-sharers suddenly scared straight?  It seems unlikely that that’s the case given the overwhelming sense of entitlement many Swedes seem to feel towards their “free” digital content.  As the BBC reported, Kjell Bohlund of the Swedish Publishers’ Association said an incredible 80 percent of Swedes don’t think copyright holders should take action against P2P users. Christian Engstrom of the Swedish Pirate Party-a political party working for copyright “reform” in Sweden (i.e. decriminalizing file-sharing)-agrees that the majority of file-sharers haven’t simply given up or seen the error of their ways.  Engstrom told the BBC, “Experience from other countries suggests that while file-sharing drops on the day a law is passed, it starts climbing again. One of the reasons is that it takes people a few weeks to figure out how to change their security settings so that they can share files anonymously.”

Turns out, he was right.  In response to the new law, Pirate Bay launched a new service just a week after IPRED took effect called (mockingly) Ipredator, which anonymizes users’ IP addresses so they can continue to share files without fear of legal action.  The service will also make it next to impossible to find identity thieves and other cyber-criminals who can now use the service to anonymously carry out even more online mayhem, but as long as illegal file traffickers can continue to get their “free stuff” this is apparently an acceptable price to pay. Before the service even went live, over 100,000 people had signed up, roughly 80 percent of them Swedes, a Pirate Bay spokesman told a Swedish news agency.

Speaking about the sense of entitlement Swedes seem to feel, Bohlund of the Swedish Publishers Association remarked, “Ultimately we have to change people’s perception on file-sharing” so that they understand they’re “taking money out of the pockets of musicians, authors or artists.” In the U.S. this education process is now underway. Several ISP’s here are now sending notices to copyright infringers along with standard cease and desist letters from copyright owners.  CNET reported that these cover letters “inform the customer that downloading unauthorized copies is illegal,” but noted that ISP’s have no intention of cutting off subscribers for repeat offenses, as would happen under a “three-strikes” rule. According to ISP’s, even without a three-strikes threat, the letters seem to be working; there have been few repeat offenders.  While it’s still early, the evidence so far seems to suggest that U.S. Internet users don’t want to contribute to the growing trend of online lawlessness and are responsive to educational efforts discouraging it. With the explosion of free and inexpensive content online-subscription based service like Netflix, ad supported like Hulu, or pay-per-download like iTunes-getting users to switch from illegal P2P downloads to legal options isn’t a tough sell.  As Billboard.biz reported earlier this month, P2P use among American teens is on the decline as they move to streaming sites that increasingly provide safe, legal, licensed content.

That’s good news, but in other parts of the world, there’s a lot more work to be done.  But with collaboration between technology companies and copyright owners-plus flexible policies that allow those companies to find innovative new ways to deliver content legally-public opinion is shifting. As Internet consumers increasingly have other legal options to enjoy content online, sites like Pirate Bay that relish thumbing their noses at the law are starting to look like the irresponsible Internet citizens that they are.

Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » The Scourge of Scandinavia: The Dread Pirate Bay

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Pirate Bay Trial Ends; Verdict Due April 17 | Threat Level from Wired.com

 Pirate Bay Trial Ends; Verdict Due April 17 | Threat Level from Wired.com

Pirate Bay Trial Ends; Verdict Due April 17

By Wired Staff EmailMarch 03, 2009 | 7:40:09 PMCategories: Yo Ho Ho

Special correspondent Oscar Swartz reports.

STOCKHOLM -- The Pirate Bay trial wrapped up here Tuesday amid a media circus as attorneys for the four accused founders of the world's most notorious BitTorrent tracker proclaimed their clients' innocence to charges of facilitating copyright infringement.

One of the attorneys declared the 2-week trial a mockery.

"These kinds of abstract case are not supposed to be brought to the court at all," attorney Per E. Samuelson said during his argument. "The prosecutor has not managed to keep calm in light of the enormous pressure and lobbying from record and film companies."

Scandinavian television teams and journalists descended upon this small courtroom to see the final hours of a case generating international headlines. The three younger of the four defendants are by now media celebrities in their own right and seemed at ease with the frantic attention they provoked.

Documentary filmmakers working on a third part of Steal This Film were feverishly capturing the drama. Reuters turned up with TV cameras and conducted interviews in English in response to "demand from our international clients."

Open culture artists like Sebastian Lütgert who ran the Pirate Cinema project in Berlin had flown in to show support for the four Pirate Bay co-defendants. One spectator showed journalists an authentic police report from a station in Stockholm where he had reported Google for facilitating copyright infringement.

For Pirate Bay fans, however, the day started in a subdued mood but ended in a bang with Samuelson's oration.

Defense lawyers for defendants Fredrik Neij and Gottfrid Svartholm Warg seemed to mostly nitpick about technicalities, but did not seem to punch significant holes in the prosecution.

Peter Sunde's lawyer, Peter Althin, turned up the heat by orating a historical exposé of how vested interests have tried to block development through legal wrangling. He mentioned that musicians fought radio, that the VCR was almost outlawed and that authors even questioned libraries. He claimed his client was only a spokesman for the tracker and challenged the industry's claim of $13 million in damages.

Althin reminded the court that industry bosses testified that CD and movie-ticket sales were dwindling on account of the Pirate Bay, which claims some 22 million users. But his own witness testified there was no scientifically established causal link between file-sharing and diminishing revenues.

All the while, defense attorney Samuelson captivated the gallery.

Formally representing Carl Lundström -- the 48-year-old outsider business executive who provided bandwidth and rack space for the Pirate Bay -- Samuelson spoke for all the defendants and handed over a stack of legal cases to the court.

"I don't think the prosecutor ever considered that such a case is not supposed to go to court," Samuelson stated confidently. "It comes into conflict with basic Swedish criminal law. There is not a single law textbook that does not clearly state that in order to be an accomplice you have to be aware of the concrete main crime that you are supposed to facilitate."

This was not the case here, he said. None of the defendants had any specific knowledge of the 33 copyright infringements charged in the case. "It is not enough, according to Swedish law, to have a general knowledge that crimes may be committed."

He said the entire case was "illegal according to Swedish law."

After it was over, the Pirate Bay crew was seen cracking jokes with prosecutor Håkan Roswall and others in the courthouse lobby.

The panel of four judges is expected to issue a verdict April 17. The defendants face up to two years in prison each and $180,000 in fines plus millions in damages.

----

Editor's note: Threat Level extends its thanks to Swedish writer Oscar Swartz for his first-rate reporting from the front line of the Pirate Bay trial.

See Also:

Pirate Bay Trial Ends; Verdict Due April 17 | Threat Level from Wired.com

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Major Brands Take on 4 Men in Landmark Copyright Case - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy

 Major Brands Take on 4 Men in Landmark Copyright Case - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy

Major Brands Take on 4 Men in Landmark Copyright Case

 

If you haven't heard about what's happening in Sweden this week, listen up — a case being heard there could change the face of Copyright law as it applies to the Web. If the defendants win, a door will be opened to free content, the result of which could significantly harm the entertainment industry (and you). If the plaintiffs win, the Web will be forever changed (potentially for the worse), and all Web content will be subject to and punishable by Copyright law.

Ever wonder why so much TV and movie content has migrated online? At first glance it would appear that the natural step for the entertainment industry was toward the Web. In the last year companies like Hulu and Netflix have given Web content a home that the general public will recognize as the place to get TV and movies.

But entertainment content has been online and easily accessible for much longer than Hulu and Netflix through sites like OVGuide, and most notably ThePirateBay.org — which offer free downloadable TV shows and movies. The catch — content from these sites is considered illegal by some, because the sites hosting content do not own the Copyrights to the content they share.

ThePirateBay is operated by four Swedish men, Frederik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Peter Sunde Kolmsioppi, and Carl Lundstorm, who today stand trial for purportedly providing such content to millions of people through their Web site.

The plaintiffs, Warner Bros. Entertainment, MGM Pictures, Columbia Pictures Industries, Twentieth Century Fox Film, Sony BMG, Universal, and EMI are out for blood, and 120 million kronor ($14.3 million) in "lost revenues". What's more, winning this case will make countless sites like ThePirateBay, OVGuide and others, which don't necessarily host the content, illegal in Sweden (and will give the defendants cause to go after similar sites elsewhere, with a precedent set by Sweden).

The defendants claim their site is legal because it acts like a search engine; but one that focuses solely on entertainment content. The site redirects users to servers in countries whose laws to not prohibit hosting Copyrighted content. The bottom line, ThePirateBay and other sites like it that connect you to streaming or downloadable content are basically niche versions of Google, Yahoo et al.

To be sure, the owners of these sites know they are pointing out illegal content. Furthermore, they're earning ad revenue from the traffic they obtain. Last month, a site called Watch-Movies.net was more or less shut down when ISPs blocked their nearly 15 million daily visitors from accessing the site, purportedly for alleged copyright infringement (though it was never proven). No laws were ever proved broken — but Time Warner Cable, Verizon and other ISPs can block access to certain sites at will.

Advertising revenue is central to ThePirateBay case because the money the site has earned is substantial — and it comes from content they don't own. However, the defendants are confident they will win because they don't host the content themselves. Bottom line — if they are guilty, then so are Google, Yahoo and any other search engines that point to such content.

This case has gained international attention, most prominently via Twitter. During yesterday's opening arguments, one defendant Tweeted that he may have been the first person to ever Tweet from inside a trial. Feeds have been set up to aggregate the thousands of conversations surrounding the trial — whose outcome will surely change the laws governing the Web.

Only two days in, CNET reports that nearly half the charges brought against ThePirateBay have already been dropped as the prosecution refocuses its case on the defendants' act of making this content available. Again, this will be a tough crime to prove, as any number of similar sites including more recognizable names can be accused of the same.

Major Brands Take on 4 Men in Landmark Copyright Case - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy